Can professionals claim the protection of consumer law? The Court of cassation has ruled on several occasions in 2022, on the application of certain provisions of the consumer code to legal persons with a commercial activity.
The introductory article of the consumer code defines:
While the Consumer Code is, in principle, applicable to relations between a “professional” and a “consumer”, some of the provisions of the same code, when expressly referred to and subject to the interpretation of these definitions by the courts, also protect “non-professionals” and even certain “professionals” in their relations with other professionals.
The Consumer Code expressly provides that (i) the regulations on unfair and deceptive commercial practices (article L. 121-5 of the consumer code) and (ii) the protection against unfair terms (articles L. 212-12 and R.212-5 of the consumer code) are applicable to relations between professionals and non-professionals.
The qualification of non-professional, which allows the application of these provisions, is subject to the interpretation made by the judges.
Some provisions on off-premises contracts (including (i) specific information requirements, and (ii) the application of specific provisions on the right of withdrawal) are extended to contracts concluded between professionals, provided that:
The first of these conditions is subject to interpretation by the judge. In this respect, the Court of cassation, by a decision of August 31, 2022 (1ere ch. civ. 1, 31 Aug. 2022, n°21-11.455), refused to exclude the application of the provisions on off-premises sales to an accounting firm that had entered into a lease agreement for a photocopier, because it had not been established that “the lease agreements fell within the scope of the company’s main activity”. Still as an example, a contract for the creation and licensing of an Internet site dedicated to the professional activity of an architect does not fall within the scope of the professional’s main activity.
The sanction for the professional can be onerous because if the right of withdrawal is not stipulated in the contract (e.g. the GTC), the period for exercising this right is extended to 12 months and the contract can even be declared null and void as the Court of Cassation ruled on August 31, 2022 (1ere ch. civ, 31 Aug 2022, 21-10.075).
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions pour votre message dont nous accusons bonne réception.
Nous reviendrons vers vous dans les meilleurs délais.
Bien sincèrement,
Altaïr Avocats